2 thoughts on “‘Sasquatch Among Wildmen’ Documentary YouTube Film”
Regarding Professor Jeff Meldrum, I highly recommend Meldrum’s book, “Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science”. Meldrum is a professor of anthropology at Idaho State University and an expert in bipedalism. Meldrum explores the footprint casts that have been made from which he extracts a tremendous amount of information about the creatures’ anatomy. The book is available on Amazon.
In general, few scientists have picked up the subject to study it, mainly because there is no funding for such studies. Some of us are using our own money to conduct experiments, but it is a time intensive effort, so stay tuned.
A key point here is that Bigfoot researchers ( at least reasonable scientific ones ) aren’t trying to prove the species’ existence through purely circumstantial evidence. The value of circumstantial evidence in any question, whether it be existence of an animal or any other scientific question, is that it can serve as a breadcrumb trail to the more solid answer. Science has higher requirement of proof than a courtroom in regards to proving the existence of an animal. This is good, but it shouldn’t limit our willingness to search. Any scientific question is good because it leads to more questions, often wholly unrelated, and thus more answers.
Regarding Professor Jeff Meldrum, I highly recommend Meldrum’s book, “Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science”. Meldrum is a professor of anthropology at Idaho State University and an expert in bipedalism. Meldrum explores the footprint casts that have been made from which he extracts a tremendous amount of information about the creatures’ anatomy. The book is available on Amazon.
In general, few scientists have picked up the subject to study it, mainly because there is no funding for such studies. Some of us are using our own money to conduct experiments, but it is a time intensive effort, so stay tuned.
A key point here is that Bigfoot researchers ( at least reasonable scientific ones ) aren’t trying to prove the species’ existence through purely circumstantial evidence. The value of circumstantial evidence in any question, whether it be existence of an animal or any other scientific question, is that it can serve as a breadcrumb trail to the more solid answer. Science has higher requirement of proof than a courtroom in regards to proving the existence of an animal. This is good, but it shouldn’t limit our willingness to search. Any scientific question is good because it leads to more questions, often wholly unrelated, and thus more answers.